Innovative teaching strategies for the development of professional competencies in virtual university environments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37910/RDP.2025.14.3.e430

Keywords:

Learning, Collaboration, Students, Technology, University

Abstract

Peruvian higher education is undergoing a transformation driven by the pedagogical challenges of post-COVID-19 virtual teaching, raising questions about faculty effectiveness in ensuring professional competencies among university students. The study aimed to determine the relationship between university teaching strategies and the development of professional competencies in virtual learning environments. Methods: A quantitative, basic research approach was applied, using a non-experimental, cross-sectional, correlational design. The sample comprised 90 tenth-semester students and 40 faculty members from the Schools of Education and Physical Education at the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru. A structured 30-item questionnaire with content validity and high reliability (α > 0.80) was employed. Descriptive analyses were conducted using percentages, and inferential analyses were performed via Pearson correlation (p < 0.05). Results: Students perceived both teaching strategies (75% in Education and 65% in Physical Education) and the achievement of professional competencies (76% and 88%, respectively) as “adequate.” Positive and significant correlations were identified between pedagogical strategies and competencies: r = 0.704 (p = 0.001) in Education and r = 0.645 (p = 0.002) in Physical Education. Teaching methods, digital tools, and resources were evidenced as key factors to enhance competencies in virtual environments. Conclusions: Virtual teaching strategies significantly impact the attainment of professional competencies, highlighting the need to strengthen faculty training in active methodologies and the pedagogical use of ICT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cerdá SLM, Núñez VK, Quirós AS. A systemic perspective for understanding digital transformation in higher education: Overview and subregional context in Latin America as evidence. Sustainability, 2021;13(23):12956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312956

2. Gallego GC, De Pablos HC, Montes BJL. Change of processes in the COVID-19 scenario: From face-to-face to remote teaching-learning systems. Sustainability, 2021;13(19):10513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910513

3. Bartolic S, Boud D, Agapito J, Verpoorten D, Williams S, Lutze, L, Guppy N. A multi-institutional assessment of changes in higher education teaching and learning in the face of COVID-19. Educational Review, 2021;74(3):517-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1955830

4. Laufer M, Leiser A, Deacon B, Perrin de Brichambaut P, Fecher B, Kobsda C, Hesse F. Digital higher education: A divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2021;18(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6

5. Olmedo TN, Martínez MM, Peña M. Effectiveness of blended instructional design based on active learning in a graphic engineering course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2020;29:810-837. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22338

6. Calderón A, Tannehill, D. Enacting a new curriculum models-based framework supported by digital technology within a learning community. European Physical Education Review, 2021;27(3):473-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20962126

7. Sandobal VVC, Bianca MMa, Barrios TH. El aula invertida como estrategia didáctica para la generación de competencias: Una revisión sistemática. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 2021;24(2):285-308. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.29027

8. Aguinaga DSG, Gallardo RJN, Campo UO, Hernández RM, Falla OJB, Garci FLA, Bravo Larrea YM. Educational scenarios using technology: Challenges and proposals during the pandemic. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications, 2022;13(4):182-195. https://doi.org/10.58346/jowua.2022.i4.012

9. Keese J, Ford DL, Luke SE, Millele VS. An individualized professional development approach for training university faculty in using a technological tool. Education and Information Technologies, 2023;28:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11792-8

10. Antera S. Professional competence of vocational teachers: A conceptual review. Vocations and Learning, 2021;14(3):459-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-021-09271-7

11. Carbonara DRMT, Antonia GJ. La virtualidad, una realidad emergente como apoyo a la educación universitaria presencial. Gaceta de Pedagogía, 2023;47):273-386. https://doi.org/10.56219/rgp.vi47.2361 12. Srivastava AP, Khurana R, Misra S, Singh PK, Yadav M, Balodi A, Dewasiri NJ, Kar S. Immersive horizons: Exploring virtual reality’s impact on higher education pedagogy and integration,2023 Fourth International Conference on Smart Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (ICSTCEE), Bengaluru, India, 2023;1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icstcee60504.2023.10584994

13. Acevedo A, Prada D, Ramírez J, Chia M, Roman J. Aula invertida para la mejora de la cultura financiera del estudiantado Santandereano: Caso Concurso Bolsa Millonaria (Colombia). Revista Espacios, 2019;40(44):1-13. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a19v40n44/19404408.html

14. Diniz TdeO, Souza RVBdeS. Aprendizagem ativa: breve revisão. Scientific Electronic Archives, 2021;14(7):84-88. https://doi.org/10.36560/14720211319

15. Ribeiro EJ, Marcondes P, Veríssimo ACd A, Detoni VSS, Bacelar KF. A sala de aula invertida: um novo paradigma para o ensino-aprendizagem. Aracê. Direitos Humanos Em Revista, 2025;7(1):701-714. https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n1-041

16. Ramesh S, Thavaraj HS, Haorei W, Ramkumar D. Effect of emotional intelligence competencies on academic performance amid college students: a strategic approach, 2021;8(2):1-4. https://doi.org/10.36713/EPRA6343

17. Chattamvelli R. Pearson’s Correlation. In: Correlation in Engineering and the Applied Sciences. Synthesis Lectures on Mathematics & Statistics. Springer, Cham, 2024:55-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51015-1_2

18. Soo Park Y, Weiss RL. Drawing a line between 2 points: Challenges and opportunities in linking assessments with key educational outcomes. Academic Medicine, 2023;97(10), 1427-1428. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000004910

19. Porat E, Shamir IT, Blau I. Teaching prototypes and pedagogical strategies in integrating OpenSim-based virtual worlds in K–12: Insights from perspectives and practices of teachers and students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2023;39(4):1141-1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12786

20. Mena GAF, Meza MJA, Fernández E, López ME. Digital collaboration in higher education: A study of digital skills and collaborative attitudes in students from diverse universities. Ecucation Sciences, 2023;14(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010036

21. Al-Fraihat D, Joy M, Masa'deh R, Sinclair J. Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020;102:67-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004

22. Jiménez RV, Vite GCS, Calaforra FPJ. El poder transformador de las TIC en el desarrollo de la competencia metacognitiva en Educación Superior. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 2024;(16):8-26. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.580501

Published

2025-12-04

How to Cite

Vildoso, J., Díaz, H., Vildoso, V., Vildoso, M., & Argota, G. (2025). Innovative teaching strategies for the development of professional competencies in virtual university environments. Revista Digital De Postgrado, 14(3), e430. https://doi.org/10.37910/RDP.2025.14.3.e430

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.